Free 186 More Best Homemade Tools eBook:  
Get 2,500+ tool plans, full site access, and more.

User Tag List

Results 1 to 5 of 5

Thread: Whole aircraft ballistic rescue parachute - GIF

  1. #1
    Supporting Member
    Join Date
    May 2024
    Posts
    2,008
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 3,283 Times in 1,409 Posts

    186 More Best Homemade Tools eBook
    New plans added on 01/08/2025: Click here for 2,690 plans for homemade tools.

  2. The Following User Says Thank You to ToolTalkBot For This Useful Post:

    nova_robotics (Dec 29, 2024)

  3. #2
    Supporting Member metric_taper's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2017
    Location
    Marion, Iowa
    Posts
    628
    Thanks
    242
    Thanked 270 Times in 164 Posts

    metric_taper's Tools
    The guy was fine until he fell out of the airplane, and sprained his ankle.

    2,500+ Tool Plans

  4. #3
    Supporting Member Frank S's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2015
    Location
    Peacock TX
    Posts
    11,719
    Thanks
    2,228
    Thanked 9,208 Times in 4,399 Posts

    Frank S's Tools
    If that parachute had been connected at the center of gravity balance point of the airplane it would have landed without damage
    Never try to tell me it can't be done
    When I have to paint I use KBS products

  5. #4
    Supporting Member Saltfever's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Location
    NorCal
    Posts
    412
    Thanks
    406
    Thanked 146 Times in 104 Posts

    Saltfever's Tools
    A couple of things to think about, Frank. The pilot restraint system is designed to attenuate a sudden stop from the front. That stretch in belts is what lowers the G-force to the human body. If it was a flat orientation, sudden stop, it might be possible the landing gear could lessen some of the impact to the spine but it's quite possible he would have a broken back. The problem with the CG attach point is the ability to easily pitch up or down from the flat position by some disturbance like wind. If the engine was running the prop would cut the parachute lines and . . . !

    PS: Commercial airlines seats are designed to attenuate a vertical force, but not so in general aviation.
    Last edited by Saltfever; Dec 25, 2024 at 06:12 PM. Reason: Added PS:

  6. The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to Saltfever For This Useful Post:

    bob_3000 (Dec 26, 2024), Frank S (Dec 26, 2024), nova_robotics (Dec 29, 2024)

  7. #5
    Supporting Member Frank S's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2015
    Location
    Peacock TX
    Posts
    11,719
    Thanks
    2,228
    Thanked 9,208 Times in 4,399 Posts

    Frank S's Tools
    Quote Originally Posted by Saltfever View Post
    A couple of things to think about, Frank. The pilot restraint system is designed to attenuate a sudden stop from the front. That stretch in belts is what lowers the G-force to the human body. If it was a flat orientation, sudden stop, it might be possible the landing gear could lessen some of the impact to the spine but it's quite possible he would have a broken back. The problem with the CG attach point is the ability to easily pitch up or down from the flat position by some disturbance like wind. If the engine was running the prop would cut the parachute lines and . . . !

    PS: Commercial airlines seats are designed to attenuate a vertical force, but not so in general aviation.
    You are right about that. I was looking at it from another perspective. In the rotary wing world if the distance of fall is great enough the pilot can control the collective pitch keeping the rotor tip speed above 90% up to 125% creating a cushion of air with balancing the positive and negative pressure reducing the descent velocity. If he can get the rotor tip speed high enough, before touching down he can increase the pitch angle to create a higher rate of lift whole the blades slow down greatly reducing the impact. without enough altitude coming in at a 30% nose down angle reduces the impact force the troops in the rear of the hello will suffer.

    When I mentioned a cg connection, I should have made it a slight nose down angle maybe 5 to 15% This would give the pilot some control of direction allowing him to possibly chose his landing zone. By utilizing the flaps, he could create a cushion of air around the wings creating some lift. tail control would prevent flat spin. It is unlikely the prop could ever cut the lines unless the plane went nose up. But like you said coming in at a nose down forward angle of at least 30% could reduce spinal injuries.



    2,500+ Tool Plans
    Never try to tell me it can't be done
    When I have to paint I use KBS products

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •