Nobel prize-winning theoretical physicist Richard Feynman on organic food and pseudoscience, in 1981.
Feynman's position is related to a logical fallacy called Appeal to nature - assuming that something is superior because it is "natural", or inferior because it is "unnatural". Those applying this tactic present varying definitions of "natural".
Is food healthier, or tastier, because it is organic? I'm open to new evidence, but, as I understand it, our answer in 2017 is the same as Feynman's answer in 1981:
"may be true, may not be true, but it hasn't been demonstrated one way or the other"
Previously:
Richard Feynman explains: What keeps a train on the track?
Bookmarks