Thanks. A tool I do not have, but sure could use.
Not to intercept Tony, with such a well developed tool and programming:
The dial indicator reads contact, plus or minus of plane established by the outboard 'feet'. Knowing distance between outboard feet [chord], and midpoint distance found by indicator [arc] boils down to representative geometry, or calculative trigonometry. It's all around us...roadways, bridges, ballistics, architecture, navigation, astronomy, surveying, even ocean towing by chain/ wire rope.
And recreating castings from machined billets.
Last edited by Toolmaker51; Dec 29, 2018 at 05:02 PM.
Sincerely,
Toolmaker51
...we'll learn more by wandering than searching...
Tony,
I always read your articles with interest. As I had not used my brain over Christmas, I decided to work out the formula for the radius before reading the appendix.
I ended up with a different and, perhaps, a simpler formula: R=(s^2 + h^2) / 2*h
(where s is half the distance between the probes, h is the value on the indicator and, ^2 means 'squared')
I hope you won't mind if I also note that there are some typos in the pdf file : in the sections were you discuss errors in the indicator reading and errors in measuring the probe spacing, the radius value are not correct.
Regards,
Paul
Paul,
I always like to find an easier way regards of where it comes from but I just don't follow your formula. Please show the full derivation. I assume that brackets could enclose the 2*h as (2*h) for clarity and that it is not ((s^2 + h^2) / 2)*h, to remove any ambiguity. In any case I am just not getting it, sometimes we get tunnel vision.
I never mind it when errors are pointed out. Thanks, I'll check it out later, I am on the wrong computer at the moment.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Bookmarks