Free 186 More Best Homemade Tools eBook:  
Get tool plans

User Tag List

Results 1 to 10 of 10

Thread: Komatsu PC8000 excavator - GIF

  1. #1
    Supporting Member
    Join Date
    May 2024
    Posts
    1,612
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 2,711 Times in 1,137 Posts

    Komatsu PC8000 excavator - GIF

    Komatsu PC8000 excavator.




    Previously:

    Komatsu D155W underwater bulldozer - photo
    Komatsu micro excavator - GIF

    186 More Best Homemade Tools eBook

  2. The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to ToolTalkBot For This Useful Post:

    albertq (Aug 2, 2024), nova_robotics (Aug 1, 2024), that_other_guy (Aug 8, 2024), tuchie (Aug 8, 2024)

  3. #2
    Supporting Member Karl_H's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2013
    Posts
    911
    Thanks
    671
    Thanked 481 Times in 266 Posts

    Karl_H's Tools
    I'm hoping my local tool rental place will get one of these soon.

    2,000+ Tool Plans

  4. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Karl_H For This Useful Post:

    davesrepair (Aug 1, 2024), that_other_guy (Aug 8, 2024)

  5. #3
    Supporting Member BuffaloJohn's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2019
    Location
    Oregon, USA
    Posts
    853
    Thanks
    309
    Thanked 443 Times in 263 Posts

    BuffaloJohn's Tools
    Found a spec page on this:

    https://www.komatsu.com/en/products/...ors/pc8000-11/

    weight comes in at 768 to 777 tons, 55 cubic yard bucket, 4020 HP motor

    track width is 8.33m (27.25ft), overall width is 10.1m (33.16ft), height is 9.775m (32.1ft) to top of cab

  6. The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to BuffaloJohn For This Useful Post:

    Karl_H (Aug 1, 2024), nova_robotics (Aug 1, 2024), that_other_guy (Aug 8, 2024)

  7. #4
    Supporting Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2018
    Posts
    2,355
    Thanks
    11,180
    Thanked 1,223 Times in 667 Posts

    nova_robotics's Tools
    Big hydraulic shovels like this usually end up in places like the oil sands in Alberta. I've seen some before, but not this big.

    Edit: Wait... does it have to have the bucket on backwards to be a hydraulic shovel? Does that make this an excavator? Is there a definitive rule on that?
    Last edited by nova_robotics; Aug 1, 2024 at 06:04 PM.

  8. #5
    Supporting Member Floradawg's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2018
    Location
    Flora, MS
    Posts
    927
    Thanks
    744
    Thanked 196 Times in 152 Posts

    Floradawg's Tools
    Wonder how the "progressives" plan to battery power that?
    Stupid is forever, ignorance can be fixed.

  9. #6
    Supporting Member BuffaloJohn's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2019
    Location
    Oregon, USA
    Posts
    853
    Thanks
    309
    Thanked 443 Times in 263 Posts

    BuffaloJohn's Tools
    Quote Originally Posted by Floradawg View Post
    Wonder how the "progressives" plan to battery power that?
    They have an electric drive version of the PC8000, each motor is 1450kW, total of 2900kW. I suppose one could try to calculate how big a battery would be.

    Tesla has a thing called a POWERWALL which is 14KWh with a max of 5KW discharge rate. 2900kW / 5kW is 580 PW battery modules and that gives just under 3 hour run time. Assuming needing to run two 8 hour shifts, that would mean 580 * ((2*8) / (14/5)) = 3314 PW battery modules which if you could stack the modules with no space between them, that makes a volume of 422 cubic meters - equivalent to the capacity of 10 bucket loads and the weight of this battery pack would be 371,200 KG, so about half again the weight of the machine.

    But, the fuel tank is 3680 gallons (13,925 ltr), so not knowing what that means in run time, I suspect battery operation is looking at a much larger battery.

    Progressives are stupid anyway...

  10. The Following User Says Thank You to BuffaloJohn For This Useful Post:

    Floradawg (Aug 2, 2024)

  11. #7
    Supporting Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2018
    Posts
    2,355
    Thanks
    11,180
    Thanked 1,223 Times in 667 Posts

    nova_robotics's Tools
    Quote Originally Posted by Floradawg View Post
    Wonder how the "progressives" plan to battery power that?
    I do a lot of work on these big Stacker Reclaimers, mostly on coal terminals. They're 100% electric and WAAAAAAY bigger than that itty bitty little toy in the above video. Like all things, it would be a dollars and cents business decision. Does lower operating cost, lower maintenance cost and longer maintenance intervals justify the (probably substantially) higher purchase price and 8-12 hour downtime to recharge the battery. Personally I think diesel would probably be a more useful machine for most use cases, but I can definitely see a lot of situations that could push a Client toward electric. Like up in the Diavik and Ekati diamond mines and some of the other very remote sites it makes a ton of sense to go 100% electric. Those places have to truck/fly in diesel. It would be a no brainer to go with an electric shovel for cases like that.


  12. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to nova_robotics For This Useful Post:

    Floradawg (Aug 2, 2024), that_other_guy (Aug 8, 2024)

  13. #8
    Supporting Member Floradawg's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2018
    Location
    Flora, MS
    Posts
    927
    Thanks
    744
    Thanked 196 Times in 152 Posts

    Floradawg's Tools
    Since they have to bring in diesel, I'm guessing they use coal to recharge?
    Stupid is forever, ignorance can be fixed.

  14. #9
    Supporting Member BuffaloJohn's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2019
    Location
    Oregon, USA
    Posts
    853
    Thanks
    309
    Thanked 443 Times in 263 Posts

    BuffaloJohn's Tools
    Quote Originally Posted by Floradawg View Post
    Since they have to bring in diesel, I'm guessing they use coal to recharge?
    The latest insanity is they want to burn trees to recharge...

  15. #10
    Supporting Member hemmjo's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2017
    Posts
    2,665
    Thanks
    251
    Thanked 1,514 Times in 855 Posts

    hemmjo's Tools
    Big Muskie was all electric!!!!! Yep it was used to dig coal for the electric power plant.




    2,000+ Tool Plans

  16. The Following User Says Thank You to hemmjo For This Useful Post:

    Floradawg (Aug 6, 2024)

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •