Agreed 100%, Frank S. Yet in the last 150 miles of my trip, after recalling what I've seen hauled overland in respect to the generator components, many other supporting actions came to mind. Excavators, graders, concrete and forms, cranes, rigging, all those operators, electricians and who knows how many other labor contributions...When these generators were first prototyped, the blades were spar-milled a lot like spars of aircraft wings. Few were made, realizing power consumed to do so, delayed offset of coal fired electric power. Hand laid fiberglass was next, I believe also first large scale use of carbon-fiber materials shortly thereafter.
When I taught middle and high school STEM presentations, tying facets of STEM together around manufacturing, we would list as many operations they could conceive needed to produce and market an item; shoes, inkpen, cell phone, ream of paper, breakfast cereal, whatever they chose to unravel. It would run through the entire day, concurrent with other discussions, where Science, Technology, Engineering, (or) Math were covered. So, would end up with dozens of considerations in their "all-encompassing" itemization. As facilitators we'd offer those too, but not in excess detail, just to trigger another flurry of 'what about' this or that.
Somewhere, not too close to days end, I'd field something like "There just can't be anything else?" "Right?" Often they emit sighs of relief or NO WAY! at that.
A favorite comeback of mine was "...so didn't someone make paint spraying equipment, for enough wheels of an entire fleet of delivery trucks...". The NO WAY became even louder.
Few things mean more to me, than being a cog in this machine we know as "Manufacturing".
And I'll side with Marv; Judge Judy doesn't warrant the risk to high-voltage wire men; but at the same time USA is a gold-medalist when it comes to certain utilities and respective codes, especially NEC, UPC, & NFPA.
Bookmarks