Free 186 More Best Homemade Tools eBook:  
Get tool plans

User Tag List

Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 1 2
Results 11 to 18 of 18

Thread: Controlled demolition dust suppression cannons - GIF

  1. #11
    Supporting Member Ralphxyz's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2016
    Posts
    1,731
    Thanks
    3,198
    Thanked 295 Times in 241 Posts

    Ralphxyz's Tools
    What did the expect? They only put explosives on the first three floors. Did they expect it to collapse straight down?

    Ralph

    186 More Best Homemade Tools eBook

  2. #12
    Supporting Member Frank S's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2015
    Location
    Peacock TX
    Posts
    11,635
    Thanks
    2,186
    Thanked 9,135 Times in 4,366 Posts

    Frank S's Tools
    Quote Originally Posted by Ralphxyz View Post
    What did the expect? They only put explosives on the first three floors. Did they expect it to collapse straight down?

    Ralph
    A lot depends on how much they pre weakened the columns in the floors above, for how many floors and how they went about weakening them. Jack hammering the concrete cladding goes a long way. Strategically placing small notches in the flanges of the columns goes even further but can be dangerous if the blast has to be delayed for several days. Much safer to wrap primer cord around the columns to be set off at the time of the blast.
    But any demolitionist will tell you there is a 50/50 chance something will not go according to plan on any given day.

    2,000+ Tool Plans
    Never try to tell me it can't be done
    When I have to paint I use KBS products

  3. #13
    Supporting Member Duke_of_URL's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2018
    Location
    Texas
    Posts
    398
    Thanks
    527
    Thanked 158 Times in 109 Posts
    This is why you hire the pros, not your brother-in-law who runs a side business selling fireworks. /s

  4. #14
    Supporting Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2016
    Posts
    1,113
    Thanks
    25
    Thanked 347 Times in 244 Posts

    old kodger's Tools
    Hope that there was nobody in that site shed.

  5. #15
    Supporting Member bob_3000's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2020
    Posts
    821
    Thanks
    467
    Thanked 270 Times in 198 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Floradawg View Post
    Nothing is guaranteed.
    Except that falling down thing.

  6. #16

    Join Date
    Mar 2015
    Posts
    44
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 18 Times in 12 Posts
    Two building demolitions at the same site provide a strong demonstration of the absurdity of the NIST conclusion of pancaking of the three WTC towers by the descending building upper floors.

    The first, skinny tower appears to be about 23 stories tall. At the initial (and only) blast,the intact top 20 or so stories falls vertically down on to bottom 3 or 4 stories, then stops descending, slowly tips to the side and crashes sideways to the ground. Steel frame? No “pancaking observed. Possible that demo crew expected pancaking since no charges are seen above the bottom stories. Apparently the tipover was not anticipated since the observers in front of the camera jumped up and ran. If demo crew anticipated tipover one would expect them to announce the fact and have observers at a safe distance, not surprised into running. Perhaps failure of wiring to timed demo charges higher up in building? Round-ended building visible adjacent to the tipped-over tower.

    Rubble from the first tipover has been cleared up when 25-story round ended building with about 3-story high ground floor level is demolished. Same failure of planning. Ground level support is blasted away and building descends vertically, crushing round floor and 2 or 3 of the residential floors, THEN STOPS and slowly tips to the side. Weight of almost the entire building is insufficient to “pancake” more that 2 or 3 floors after energy of descending building is absorbed by crushing the bottom few stories. Crew apparently consists of very slow learners to have two identical failures in succession at the same location. This tipover was clearly not anticipated (planned) judging from the many people scattering from the site. Additionally, two shacks or possibly a venicle and a shack of some sort were crushed by the building and possibly a shipping container was barely missed. Surely not planned.

    Does that provide any insight into the WTC official story/

  7. #17
    Supporting Member Fluffle-Valve's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2015
    Location
    Duston, Northampton, UK
    Posts
    583
    Thanks
    86
    Thanked 101 Times in 82 Posts
    Woops a daisey.
    I have a 1972 Land Rover Series III Truck Cab/Pick-Up and a 1962 Land Rover Series 2a Carawagon Camper.

  8. #18
    mccwho's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2020
    Posts
    164
    Thanks
    234
    Thanked 38 Times in 23 Posts
    Some people fail to complete the course in implosion studies before they get too excited to try it.



    2,000+ Tool Plans

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •