For the walls with the "wavy" infill or the re-bar reinforcement it wouldn't be difficult to do a long-nozzle expanding foam insulation to fill the cavities from the bottom of the wall to the top. That said, you're right. I'd guess that they have, as-built ignoring any funny business with e.g. styrofoam balls in the concrete mix, an R value of about 1.
These look like test pieces to me. I don't think they are meant for a practical use.
My first thought was different, that the age-old W form successful in trusses was used.
Seen videos about physical construction, but seem pointless generating items that a simple and reusable mold already does. Thus far, I doubt weight or material saving justifies the increased time spent on a $300,000 cake decorator.
Sincerely,
Toolmaker51
...we'll learn more by wandering than searching...
That's a valid criticism. This is a developing technology that isn't mature yet. It would be a mistake to write it off though; it's developing fast. It'd be pretty cool if you could rent a house-o-matic and print a new workshop in a weekend. Bricklaying robots are the same way. The tech for those is well developed now, and the delay is getting the cost down enough that it's cheaper than human labor.
Toolmaker51 (May 24, 2021)
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Bookmarks